You're in a team meeting. Your colleague presents an idea.
Your manager dismisses it with a sarcastic, rude comment that lands with a thud. Everyone shifts uncomfortably in their seats. You notice your colleague's face flush. The meeting continues. You say nothing.
That night, driving home, you replay it in your mind. Why didn't I say something?
If you've experienced this, you're not weak, not complicit, and definitely not alone. You've experienced the bystander effect—a well-documented psychological phenomenon in which the presence of others makes us less likely to act, even when we know we should.
What's Really Happening in Your Brain 🧠
When we witness something inappropriate, our brains don't automatically shift into action mode. Instead, we experience what researchers call "pluralistic ignorance" - we look to others to gauge how serious the situation is. When everyone else appears calm or unresponsive, our brain interprets this as "maybe this isn't actually a problem."
Add in the freeze response - a neurological survival mechanism that kicks in during moments of stress or uncertainty - and you've got a recipe for inaction. Your amygdala floods your system with stress hormones. Your prefrontal cortex, responsible for complex decision-making, temporarily goes offline. You literally can't think of what to say.
This isn't a character flaw. This is neuroscience.
Why Workplace Hierarchies Amplify the Effect 🤔
The bystander effect doesn't operate in a vacuum. In organisational settings, we layer on additional complexities:
Power dynamics. When inappropriate behaviour comes from someone senior, the authority differential intensifies our freeze response. Speaking up feels risky - to our career advancement, our performance review, and our standing in the organisation.
Professional relationships. We work in environments where collaboration and reputation matter. Calling out behaviour threatens the very networks we've carefully built to be effective in our roles.
The professionalism paradox. Corporate and government cultures often prize "fitting in" and "being a team player." Naming something as problematic can feel like being difficult or overly sensitive and people fear being labelled.
The Data Doesn't Lie 📊
These aren't theoretical problems. Research consistently shows that workplace misconduct - from subtle exclusion to overt harassment - is remarkably common. Australian Human Rights Commission data reveal that 33% of people have experienced workplace sexual harassment. Fair Work Commission statistics show bullying claims have remained persistently high across all sectors.
But here's what the data also shows: most people who witness inappropriate workplace behaviour do nothing. Not because they don't care, but because they don't know how to act effectively in the moment.
Research from Protection Approaches found that in organisations where bystanders receive no training, intervention rates hover around 20-30%. But when people are trained in practical intervention strategies, that rate jumps to 60-70%.
The difference isn't simply ‘have courage’. It's skills.
The Silence Speaks Volumes 🤫
Every time we witness problematic behaviour and say nothing, we inadvertently send a message: this is acceptable here. Our silence becomes permission. The behaviour continues. The culture calcifies.
When the sarcastic manager dismisses another idea in the next meeting, it stings a little less for everyone. Not because it's less harmful, but because we've normalised it. When the inappropriate joke gets told in the kitchen, the laughter comes more easily. When exclusionary behaviour happens again, we barely notice anymore.
But here's the truth I've come to understand through decades of working in this space:
There are no bystanders, only people who act or people who regret staying silent.
You're not passive. You're not neutral. Your presence in that moment means you have power - the power to change the trajectory of what happens next.
The question isn't whether you have a responsibility to act. The question is: do you have the skills to act effectively?
From Awareness to Action ✅
Knowing about the bystander effect is useful. Understanding why your brain freezes helps you be less harsh on yourself for past moments of silence. But awareness alone doesn't change behaviour.
What changes behaviour is having a toolkit - practical, rehearsed strategies that your brain can access even when stress hormones are flooding your system. It's about building new neural pathways through practice so that in the moment, you have options.
That's what we're going to explore in this series.
Because silence has a cost - and upskilling has a payoff.
Next up: We'll examine exactly what silence costs us - personally, professionally, and organisationally. Spoiler: it's more than you think.
Behind every statistic is a person who experienced harm. And often, someone who witnessed it and stayed silent.
This Isn't About Courage 💯
Here's what I've learned after years of working in this space: Bystander intervention isn't about character or courage. It's about skills. Skills that can be learned, practiced, and deployed effectively.
Over this blog series, we're going to unpack:
Why good people stay silent (spoiler: it's more complex than you think)
What that silence costs our teams and organisations
What actually works to create a culture where people speak up
Practical strategies you can use tomorrow
Because the question isn't whether you should say something when you witness misconduct. The question is: do you know how to say something effectively?
Let's figure this out together. 💯
What's your experience with this? Have you ever replayed a moment where you wish you'd spoken up? 🤔
You want to know more about how Blythe creates meaningful connections? ✨
👉 Check out Blythe’s LinkedIn profile to read more articles and blogs!
